Bloomsbury Home
This product is usually dispatched within 2-4 weeks
- Delivery and returns info
-
Flat rate of $10.00 for shipping anywhere in Australia
Inspection copy added to basket
This title is available for inspection copy requests.
Please note our inspection copies are only available in ebook format, and are fulfilled by VitalSource™. If an ebook isn’t available, please visit our inspection copy page for more information.
You must sign in to add this item to your wishlist. Please sign in or create an account
Description
In the midst of the Vietnam War, two titans of the Senate, J. William Fulbright and John C. Stennis, held public hearings to debate the conflict's future. In this intriguing new work, historian Joseph A. Fry provides the first comparative analysis of these inquiries and the senior southern Senators who led them.
The Senators' shared aim was to alter the Johnson administration's strategy and bring an end to the war—but from dramatically different perspectives. Fulbright hoped to pressure Johnson to halt escalation and seek a negotiated settlement, while Stennis wanted to prompt the President to bomb North Vietnam more aggressively and secure a victorious end to the war. Publicized and televised, these hearings added fuel to the fire of national debate over Vietnam policy and captured the many arguments of both hawks and doves.
Fry details the dramatic confrontations between the Senate committees and the administration spokesmen, Dean Rusk and Robert McNamara, and he probes the success of congressional efforts to influence Vietnam policy. Ultimately, Fry shows how the Fulbright and Stennis hearings provide vivid insight into the debate over why the United States was involved in Vietnam and how the war should be conducted.
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: Fulbright, Stennis, and Their Hearings
Chapter 2: Fulbright and the SFRC Challenge Johnson
Chapter 3: The SFRC Interrogates Taylor and Rusk
Chapter 4: Stennis and the SPIS Challenge Johnson
Chapter 5: The SPIS Interrogates McNamara
Chapter 6: Fulbright, Stennis, and the End of the War
Bibliographic Essay
Product details
Published | 22 Sep 2006 |
---|---|
Format | Paperback |
Edition | 1st |
Extent | 216 |
ISBN | 9780742544369 |
Imprint | Rowman & Littlefield Publishers |
Dimensions | 229 x 153 mm |
Series | Vietnam: America in the War Years |
Publisher | Bloomsbury Publishing |
About the contributors
Reviews
-
Vivid retellings of testimonies by Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, Secretary of State Dean Rusk, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Maxwell Taylor, and others enliven the text. These hearings were vital public education forums, and in the case of Fulbright's hearings, made opposition to the war respectable. Fry's book is strongly recommended.
Karl Helicher, Library Journal
-
An original and invaluable study. By looking closely at two well-known Senate hearings during the Johnson years, Fry tells us much that is new and important about Congress and the Vietnam War.
George Herring, author of America's Longest War
-
Professor Fry's lucid and illuminating comparative analysis of the Fulbright-Stennis Senate hearings is a much needed and most welcome addition to the historical scholarship on the Vietnam War. Engagingly written and persuasively argued, Fry's book demonstrates that these hearings sparked overdue public debate on the contesting views on how to extricate the United States from the nightmare of Vietnam. This book will enlighten and educate the expert as well as the general reader and should appeal to all students of the Vietnam War.
Edward P. Crapol, Pullen Professor, Emeritus, College of William and Mary
-
A fascinating comparison of two very different congressional heavyweights. Anyone attempting to come to grips with the complex relationship between American politics and the Vietnam War must read this book.
Randall Woods, author of LBJ: Architect of American Ambition
-
Adroitly placing two senators of towering influence at each pole in the debate over Vietnam, this book offers a unique way to approach the Vietnam War. Joseph Fry's mastery of U.S. foreign policy is evident as he catches the nuances and contradictions in this battle of ideas in Congress, a forum that has not received its due when scholars examine America's longest war. Readers cannot help but take sides in this grand debate between the best and the brightest in the Johnson administration and congressional heavyweights. As they absorb the lessons of yesterday, students will ponder the hard choices of negotiation or war today.
Thomas W. Zeiler, author of Ambassadors in Pinstripes: The Spalding World Baseball Tour and the Birth of the American Empire
-
Those interested in Congress's role during the Vietnam War could do no better than this superb work. Highly recommended.
Choice Reviews