While an excellent example of how historians can take their readers behind the curtain and into the research process with them, Debunking the Yule Log Myth also offers a compelling demonstration on the changes wrought in historical research by advances in database technology.

H-Net Reviews

An enduring piece of antebellum folklore has claimed that enslavers allowed enslaved people a week or more of time off during Christmas to “do what they wished.” The actual length of time they were free from forced labor depended on how long it took for a water-soaked Yule log burned in their master's fireplace to burn down. This story-which typically highlighted the tolerance of enslavers and the willingness of enslaved people doing whatever it took to keep logs burning for as long as possible-was so entrenched in Southern culture that the Southern tourist industry was still using it for Christmas travel publicity campaigns in 2012. To find the truth behind the story, May, a professor emeritus of history at Purdue University, examined a wide variety of sources, including newspapers, first-person accounts, novels, and historical documents. What he discovered suggested conscious efforts, begun during Reconstruction, at a cultural makeover. The Christmas Yule log tradition was an import from England that was traceable to colonial Virginia. But by the 1870s, and just as “ex-Confederates regained their mastery over southern politics,” May observes, reconciliationist narratives that peddled sentimental visions of the antebellum South began appearing in popular magazines like the Atlantic Monthly. The dark side of such stories was that they rarely denounced slavery because to do so would have implied a renunciation not just of the Confederacy but-perhaps even more importantly-white Southern values. A thoughtful antidote to white Southern propaganda.

Kirkus Reviews

In Debunking the Yule Log Myth, Robert May brilliantly excavates the fascinating story of a Christmas fantasy about giant logs and enslaved African Americans that white southerners used to justify slavery, the Confederate Lost Cause narrative, racial segregation, and then that became enshrined in American folklore. A major piece of historical detective work with surprising twists, it deserves a broad readership.

John David Smith, author of An Old Creed for the New South: Proslavery Ideology and Historiography, 1865-1918

As Hemingway might say, it would be pretty to think so. Among the many pleasures of Robert E. May's splendid Debunking the Yule Log Myth is watching a talented historian methodically dismantle one of American folklore's prettiest tales. Along the way, in a tour de force of historiographic sleuthing, May explores the origins of the apocryphal story of antebellum, southern plantation-masters allowing a sustained Christmas break for enslaved peoples and the motivations of those who have sustained and embellished the tale. A compelling cautionary-tale on the folly of blind acceptance of 'pretty' stories.

Tom Chaffin, author of Odyssey: Charles Darwin, the Beagle, and the Voyage that Changed the World

Expertly crafted and deeply reflective, May's critical appraisal of what initially seemed a story about resourceful slaves "besting [their] masters" covers new ground, contributing meaningfully to both the history of slavery and the study of historical writing.

Choice

May makes a convincing and extensively documented case for Yule log stories being post–Civil War creations told to romanticize enslavement and obliterate its evils. Those seeking to understand the development and function of the plantation myth in the post-war South should read Debunking the Yule Log Myth.

Journal of Southern History