This short contribution to the emerging field of comparative political theory is predicated on the need to open political theory to non-Western theorists, works, processes, and events; show how these reflect non-Western cultural dispositions; and bring more rigor to political theory scholarship and practice writ large. Bashir (Texas A&M Univ., Qatar) discusses three cross-cultural exchanges between Europeans and non-Westerners during the medieval and premodern periods. The three case studies—which focus on encounters between Europeans and Mongols in the 13th century, Europeans and the Mughals in India under the rule of Akbar the Great, and Europeans and the Chinese literati during the late Ming period—provide a sense of progression in the history of Europeans' relations with cultural others. The studies are based on a wide range of primary texts, such as official court histories, personal diaries, relevant correspondence, and eyewitness accounts left by Western representatives in Eastern lands. The volume will interest comparative political theorists. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduate, graduate, and research collections.

Choice Reviews

In the present monograph, Hassan Bashir seeks to make a contribution to Comparative Political Theory (CPT). Departing from what he characterises as the common practice in this sub-field of constructing dialogues between Western thinkers and ‘cultural others’, Bashir examines four historic cases of cross-cultural contact from the pre-Enlightenment period: William of Rubruck’s reports of his journey to the Mongol lands (1253–5); the Jesuits’ reflection on their Mission to Akbar ‘s Court in India (1580–3); the Jesuit scientist Matteo Ricci’s experiences while seeking to Christianise China (1582–1610); and the Dominican Barthomé de La Casas’ (1484–1566) advocacy role for the indigenous peoples of the New World. With a focus on their political theory dimensions, these examples are employed to lend weight to Bashir’s claims concerning some erroneous foundational assumptions common in CPT. . . .[R]eflective readers are left with several cogent points of consideration regarding comparative political theorising on interrelated methodological and contextual levels.

Political Studies Review

Hassan Bashir’s Europe and the Eastern Other is dazzling in both the breadth of its conception and the depth of its analysis, offering innovative and startling insights into intercultural and cross-cultural contact and dialogue between pre-modern Europe and non-Western societies and polities. Bashir’s study constitutes an indispensable contribution to an exciting emergent area of scholarly investigation.

Cary J. Nederman, Texas A&M University

Europe and the Eastern Other reminds us what comparative political theory—and political theory in general—stands to gain by examining cross-cultural exchanges between West and non-West before the European Enlightenment. Bashir provides an important contribution to the study of comparative political theory, deepening our understanding of why precisely we should be engaging in such study: namely, because the foundations of one’s own cultural self-understanding are developed in contrast to knowledge about cultural others.

Farah Godrej, University of California, Riverside