- Home
- ACADEMIC
- Communication Studies
- Political Communication
- North Korea and South Korea
Payment for this pre-order will be taken when the item becomes available
- Delivery and returns info
-
Flat rate of $10.00 for shipping anywhere in Australia
You must sign in to add this item to your wishlist. Please sign in or create an account
Description
The autocratic regimes in both North Korea and South Korea attempted to legitimize their rule through efforts in nation-building but achieved different results. North Korea and South Korea: Monopolizing Nationalism in a Divided Peninsula seeks to answer: How did these regimes' nation-building strategies through a variety of tools and venues differ in the process of regime development? How was nationalism utilized to construct a regime-legitimizing founding myth? What implications did these varied efforts have on authoritarian legitimacy and state-society relations under authoritarian rule?
Focusing on the period from the end of the Second World War and the start of the Korean War to South Korea's democratic transitions in the 1980s and North Korea's crises in the 1990s, Qingming Huang examines the authoritarian regimes' efforts in monopolizing the narratives of nationalism and constructing the founding myths of the regimes through textbooks and other myth-making venues. Huang argues that the North Korean regime's monopoly of nationalism helped it construct the founding myth of the party-state as an essential source of regime legitimacy. In contrast, the autocratic regimes in South Korea failed to eliminate the competing narratives about the nation and were unable to monopolize nationalism. As a result, South Korea struggled to construct a founding myth to buttress the regimes and became more vulnerable to domestic challenges.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Chapter 1 Nationalism, Founding Myth, and Regime Legitimacy
Chapter 2 Kim Il Sung: Monopolizing Nationalism and Constructing the Founding Myth
Chapter 3 Syngman Rhee: Idolization of Rhee with the Independence Spirit
Chapter 4 Park Chung Hee: The “Savior” of the Nation
Chapter 5 Chun Doo Hwan: Rescuing “the Sinking Ship of State”
Conclusion and Discussion
References
About the Author
Product details
| Published | 28 May 2026 |
|---|---|
| Format | Hardback |
| Edition | 1st |
| Extent | 184 |
| ISBN | 9781666962680 |
| Imprint | Bloomsbury Academic |
| Illustrations | n/a |
| Dimensions | 229 x 152 mm |
| Series | Bloomsbury Studies on Korea's Place in International Relations |
| Publisher | Bloomsbury Publishing |
About the contributors
Reviews
-
Why did South Korea experience regime changes in the 1960s and 1980s, but North Korea did not? Using original sources in Korean, Dr. Huang compellingly demonstrates how North Korean leaders outperformed their South Korean rivals in constructing a founding myth and establishing a monopoly of nationalism during the early period of state and regime formation. The North Korean regime's success in its legitimation strategy contributed to its stability whereas South Korea was plagued by political upheavals throughout the 1960s-1980s. This book breaks away from most studies of North Korea that mythicize the North Korean regime and offers an illuminating comparison of the two Koreas. It is an impressive and valuable book for students of modern Korea, postcolonial Asia, comparative nationalism and comparative authoritarianism.
Tuong Vu, University of Oregon, USA
-
This important study breaks new ground by comparing the attempts of North Korea and South Korea to use their educational systems to construct regime-legitimizing founding myths. The book will be of interest to specialists in Korean politics and history, as well as to scholars of authoritarian resilience in communist and noncommunist regimes.
Martin K. Dimitrov, Livingston Family Chair in Political Science, Tulane University, USA
-
This groundbreaking book offers an unprecedented lens on inter-Korean dynamics by weaving together historical depth, contemporary analysis, and cultural insight. With clarity and rigor, it illuminates the complexities of division and dialogue, bridging scholarly precision with accessibility. Unique in its interdisciplinary scope and balanced perspective, it stands as an indispensable guide for anyone seeking to understand the Korean peninsula's past, present, and future.
Sang Hwan Seong, Seoul National University, South Korea

























