Bloomsbury Home
- Home
- ACADEMIC
- Philosophy
- Philosophy - Other
- David Hume's Argument Against Miracles
This product is usually dispatched within 1 week
- Delivery and returns info
-
Free CA delivery on orders $40 or over
You must sign in to add this item to your wishlist. Please sign in or create an account
Description
In this book the author offers a critical analysis of David Hume's argument against miracles from his Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, "Of Miracles" is one of the most influential works written in defense of the position that belief in supernatural occurrences is not reasonable. Using Hume's work as a point of departure, the author addresses the two most important epistemological questions asked about miracles: Is it ever reasonable to ascribe a divine source to an anomalous event in order to identify it as miraculous? and What theoretically entails sufficient evidence that a miracle has actually taken place? Contemporary rehabilitations of Hume's argument, as put forth by Antony Flew, Alastair McKinnon, and Patrick Nowell-Smith, are evaluated. Contents: Defining the Miraculous; Hume's Argument, Part 1;Hume's Argument, Part 2;The Rationality of Belief and the Existence of God; Contemporary Rehabilitations of Hume's Argument; and Miracles and Evidence.
Product details
Published | Sep 30 1989 |
---|---|
Format | Hardback |
Edition | 1st |
Extent | 160 |
ISBN | 9780819174871 |
Imprint | University Press of America |
Dimensions | 229 x 152 mm |
Publisher | Bloomsbury Publishing |
About the contributors
Reviews
-
...an excellent textbook for courses on Hume and on philosophy of religion generally. It deserves a wide audience because it combines philosophical rigor with clarity of style.
J.P. Moreland, Professor of Philosophy, The Journal Of Religion
-
The discussion is lively and well informed by recent scholarship.
The Journal Of Religion
-
The discussion is lively and well informed by recent scholarship.
The Journal Of Religion
-
...an excellent textbook for courses on Hume and on philosophy of religion generally. It deserves a wide audience because it combines philosophical rigor with clarity of style.
J.P. Moreland, Professor of Philosophy, The Journal Of Religion