This detailed, meticulous study addresses the confusion surrounding Heidegger scholarship. Cutting through all mysticism associated with the question of being, Sheehan uncovers the phenomenological bases of the 'early' and 'late' Heidegger, paying special attention to their Aristotelian heritage. Sheehan’s argument, at its core, is persuasive: he contends that the obsession with being has obscured the reality that the center of Heidegger’s entire project is the 'clearing,' wherein being takes place. Sheehan attaches a number of key Greek and Heideggerian terms to the idea of the clearing—for instance, the Logos that keeps it open or its becoming-one’s-own (Eigentum) in the event (Ereignis). The book is insightful not only as a contribution to Heidegger studies but also as a source of inroads into ancient Greek philosophy, informed by a new understanding of Heidegger's thought. Summing Up: Essential. Graduate students, researchers, and faculty.

Choice Reviews

Sheehan offers a highly original interpretation, which helps to make sense of a number of difficult passages. . . .Drawing on an exhaustive command of the primary material, Sheehan offers a plausible interpretation of Heidegger’s development and many of his key concepts, compellingly arguing that his thought is phenomenological from beginning to end. The argumentation is transparent and remains close to the texts, which readers can often consult (usually in the original language) in the footnotes. . . .All in all, this study offers a unique, compellingly argued account of Heidegger’s thought, and a measured appraisal of its successes, failures, and merits. It ought to be a key point of reference in future Heidegger scholarship.

Philosophy in Review

[A]n important, if controversial, book … If Sheehan's stature as a commentator on Heidegger were not already enough to recommend it, the book is written in a lucid and approachable style … Repeatedly Sheehan draws on his wide knowledge of the Collected Works to make or illustrate important connections in Heidegger's thinking across his whole corpus … Sheehan's book is a significant achievement, and it will assist many, especially relatively new, readers of Heidegger.

Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

Much of Sheehan’s work here is immensely clarifying; several of his remarks have already made their way to the marginalia of this reviewer’s copy of Being and Time. . . .Sheehan sufficiently demonstrates…that Heidegger is worth reading, and this is an important achievement, especially in the face of calls to consign Heidegger’s corpus to the Nazi stacks in the library. Heidegger should be read as a philosopher because at his best he is not a commentator on philosophers but the initiator of a philosophical conversation. Sheehan’s book admirably displays Heidegger’s talent for breathing life into Aristotle, Plato, and the Presocratics, and in turn for drawing his own philosophical inspiration from them. Thus, Sheehan’s will be a welcome, if controversial, addition to Heideggerean scholarship, and certainly worth reading for those who need to be convinced to turn (or return) to Heidegger as a powerful philosophical interlocutor.

Review of Metaphysics

In this brilliant contribution to Heidegger scholarship, Thomas Sheehan presents his view of the entire trajectory of Heidegger’s philosophizing as a phenomenological investigation of the meaning and source of Being (the “clearing”) — that which allows entities to show up for us as meaningful. Sheehan’s assiduously phenomenological interpretation of the Heideggerian corpus lends itself beautifully both to teaching Heidegger and to interdisciplinary inquiry.

Robert D. Stolorow Ph.D., author of World, Affectivity, Trauma: Heidegger and Post-Cartesian Psychoanalysis

Thomas Sheehan's eagerly awaited volume is certain to shake up the field of Heidegger studies. Beyond that, however, the new paradigm it advocates - the idea that Heidegger should be read from first to last in phenomenological terms - provides an excellent framework for showing how Heidegger's thought can contribute to contemporary philosophical debates. A work of keen scholarship, powerfully argued, Sheehan's book will be widely discussed.

Steven Crowell, Joseph and Joanna Nazro Mullen Professor of Philosophy, Rice University