This thoughtful and carefully organized book draws on a rich network of evidence to demonstrate the harm done when students are placed in academic courses based on demographic data. Using numerous examples, authors Faulkner, Marshall, and Stiff (all, North Carolina State Univ.) demonstrate clearly that when well-meaning education professionals rely on their perceptions of student ability, achievement gaps are reinforced. They make a compelling case for the use of objective data to place students in courses designed to help them succeed, while also discussing the limitations of objective data. Addressing confirmation bias, confabulation, and other problematic behaviors, they offer practical solutions to overcome these obstacles. Overall, the book uses sources efficiently and employs them in a way that would not be overwhelming to undergraduates or in-service teachers. The discussion questions at the end of the book, organized by chapter, make this an excellent text for undergraduate methods-of-teaching courses, professional learning communities, and professional development for in-service teachers. The thorough reference list also makes this an excellent text for graduate study.



Summing Up: Recommended. Lower-division undergraduates through graduate students; professionals

Choice Reviews

Radical responses to oppression and dehumanization in mathematics education will require re-imagining new and different possibilities that do not produce new and different forms of oppression and dehumanization. This book takes up the challenge of re-imagining by telling a different story about so-called racial achievement gaps that position Black students as inferior. They recast the story in terms of opportunity and decision-making in the system that often fails Black students.

Danny Bernard Martin, professor, education and mathematics, University of Illinois at Chicago

The Stories We Tell: Math, Race, Bias & Opportunity challenges the traditional dialogue about the achievement gap and radically reframes it. By problematizing data, ability grouping, and growth mindset, the authors provide new lenses by which we can examine these constructs with the goal of compelling us to think critically about our role in maintaining or changing the system. The authors offer a solid theoretical framing paired with practical recommendations for practice. This book is a must-read for anyone involved in making decisions related to the teaching and learning of mathematics.

Marrielle Myers, Associate Professor of Elementary Mathematics Education, Kennesaw State University

The Stories We Tell: Math, Race, Bias, and Opportunity pushes readers to consider the many factors, decisions, and opportunities that contribute to differentials in achievement. The authors describe these as ‘gap makers’ which are fully examined as contributors to differences in achievement among learners. Readers are asked, “What if the students are not the problem to be fixed?” This book provides a framing for consideration towards the answer to this question by unpacking the many factors, decisions, and opportunities in a context that is accessible to educators across the grade bands. Educators will find that use of different contexts and vignettes provides connections that give meaning to why some students have an engaging mathematics experience built on high expectations with access to rigorous mathematics and, other students do not have access to this type of mathematics experiences. I will use this book with educators who influence policies as well as mathematics teachers and coaches to help examine the structural issues and the decisions that impact mathematics teaching and learning.

Robert Q. Berry, Professor of Mathematics Education, University of Virginia; President, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2018-2020)

Finally, a book that sits the “gap problem” on the doorsteps of schools and districts and off the backs of children and parents. In this book, the authors use data to challenge our assumptions on achievement, rigor, and accountability as they explain how the decisions made by school administrations and politicians create, maintain, and exasperate the inequitable education of students. The authors provide new and realistic decisions we can all make to travel on their path to change.

Dorothy Y. White, PhD, Associate Professor of Mathematics Education, University of Georgia

The school mathematics ecosystem represents an important opportunity structure in the field of education. This research captures the contours of this ecosystem with a focus on how it produces disparities. The book documents the challenges associated with improper data interpretation, bias, and cognitive dissonance. These biases influence decisions and support the creation of underdeveloped learning processes and harmful outcomes. The scholarship contributes to the literature on opportunity to learn in mathematics education.

William F. Tate IV, Edward Mallinckrodt Distinguished University Professor in Arts & Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis