Perhaps not since the Cold War have public debates been conducted with such explicitly ideological terms and clear commitments. After the prevailing centrism of Western politics at the close of the Cold War and the immediate post-9/11 era, political discussion within the West is again concerned with questions regarding Marxism as a social and political theory. As is evident within the United States, these debates have grown increasingly polarized of late within segments of both the Democratic and Republican parties as to how forcefully to adopt or oppose various components or contributions of Marxist analysis. This resurgence of explicit ideology has also contributed to the increase of polarization and extremism. In this fraught moment of concern about political conflicts and polarization towards extreme political positions within both US political parties, it is helpful to remember that history provides examples of countervailing reactions and reconsiderations generated from within extreme ideologies where former partisans abandoned prior commitments and formulations and adjusted their positions as a concession to their lived experience of reality. Lee Trepanier and Grant Havers have provided just such a reminder in Walk Away: When the Political Right Turns Left and perhaps provided examples for future emulation.

VoegelinView

This is a fine collection of thoughtful, philosophically rigorous, and illuminating studies of major twentieth century leftist thinkers who journeyed rightward. We are offered fascinating and even riveting accounts of radicals coming to grips with and overcoming the dogmas in which they had become immersed. No one, left or right, is immune to the allure of dogma, and this book shows every intellectually serious person the challenge we all face in attaining a genuinely free soul.

Luigi Bradizza, Salve Regina University

Havers and Trepanier have put together an eminently readable and illuminating volume on the philosophical and ideological exodus of leftist thinkers to the right during the 20th century. In addition to the perspective and clarity it provides regarding major 20th century events, it gives us an analytical framework to assess similar shifts in contemporary politics. Serious students of politics, from both the left and right, can learn from the valuable insights in this volume.

David Whitney, Nicholl State University

This volume reveals how, time and again, the experience of the soul has entailed consequential differences between progressive and conservative thinkers. A thorough and persuasive case is made in these pages - when leftist ideologues open themselves to the truth and the good of the order of being, a meaningful transition of political identity from left to right follows. A must-read for serious scholars of ideology and, perhaps especially, for left-leaning individuals who have begun to question their own ideology.

Scott Robinson, Houston Baptist University

Nietzsche in the Will to Power writes: “The charm that works for us, the Venus eye that fascinates even our foes and blinds them, is the magic of the extreme….” The contributors to this volume showcase twentieth-century thinkers who were not so easily charmed by the extreme of the leftist politics they once held. All drew the Aristotelian conclusion that any political form taken to its extreme results in tyranny. Some pragmatically turned to conservatism as the best defense against communism. Others leavened their leftism with traditionalism, religion, nationalism, or communitarianism as a way of moderating their progressivism. Still others suffered religious conversion upon beholding the “Venus eye” which represented for them the metaphysical rebellion grounding political extremism. In a time now characterized by what Pierre Manent calls the “fanaticism of the center,” this is volume provides welcome assistance for resisting the charm of the extreme.

John von Heyking, University of Lethbridge