Free UK delivery for orders £30
Payment for this pre-order will be taken when the item becomes available
Free UK delivery on orders £30 or over
You must sign in to add this item to your wishlist. Please sign in or create an account
In Islamic Liberalism: A Theory of Impossibility based on the Lockean Tradition, Halil Ibrahim Canbegi investigates the inherent inconsistencies of Islamic liberalism by examining the philosophical and theological foundations of both liberalism and Islam. Canbegi draws on Lockean liberalism, asserting that John Locke's emerging liberalism is deeply rooted in theological concepts such as covenant theology, natural law, and the distinctive nature of Christianity itself. In contrast, the author argues that Islam lacks the necessary theological and intellectual framework to develop a coherent version of liberalism, often termed Islamic liberalism. Canbegi maintains that this concept merely represents a superficial juxtaposition of Islam and liberalism, rather than a genuine synthesis. Ultimately, the author concludes that Islamic liberalism is merely a heterogeneous amalgamation of Islamic and liberal ideas, which do not combine into a unified whole. This critical analysis challenges prevailing notions and invites readers to reconsider the complex relationship between these two influential systems of thought.
Published | 10 Jul 2025 |
---|---|
Format | Hardback |
Edition | 1st |
Extent | 230 |
ISBN | 9781666966985 |
Imprint | Bloomsbury Academic |
Illustrations | 0 tables |
Dimensions | 229 x 152 mm |
Publisher | Bloomsbury Publishing |
A Theory of Impossibility Based on the Lockean Tradition undertakes a challenging task: refuting the possibility of Islamic liberalism. Canbegi argues that the Islamic political tradition lacks the Lockean foundation that underpins Western liberalism. According to Canbegi, 'Islamic liberalism stands only as a juxtaposition of Islam and liberalism; it does not represent something distinct from Islam or liberalism.' This impossibility, he contends, stems from fundamental differences between the Western and Islamic traditions in their conceptions of natural law.
This book warrants attention for two main reasons. First, it boldly challenges the emerging intellectual consensus that supports the compatibility of Islam and liberalism. Second, it transcends practical legal debates by addressing the structural concepts-such as natural law-that define the relationship between these two traditions.
Gokhan Bacik, Palacky University, Czech Republic
Your School account is not valid for the United Kingdom site. You have been logged out of your account.
You are on the United Kingdom site. Would you like to go to the United States site?
Error message.