- Home
- ACADEMIC
- Politics & International Relations
- Political Theory and Philosophy
- Republican Paradoxes and Liberal Anxieties
Republican Paradoxes and Liberal Anxieties
Retrieving Neglected Fragments of Political Theory
Republican Paradoxes and Liberal Anxieties
Retrieving Neglected Fragments of Political Theory
You must sign in to add this item to your wishlist. Please sign in or create an account
Description
Ronald J. Terchek offers insightful and original solutions to the intellectual rigidity and theoretical fragmentation that characterize much contemporary debate in political philosophy. Offering fresh interpretations of republicans such as Aristotle, Machiavelli, and Rousseau, and liberals such as Locke, Smith, and Mill, Terchek persuasively argues that these 'strong' republicans and 'anxious' liberals share certain fundamental principles and ideals, despite their conflicting beliefs about the primacy of community, rights, citizenship, moral development, and the roots of human behavior. This critical analysis of the modern state of political theory challenges political theorists to avoid contentious debates and to abandon the apolitical and inflexible construction of the liberal-communitarian paradigm. This is important reading for anyone interested in political philosophy and theory.
Product details
Published | 01 Jan 2000 |
---|---|
Format | Ebook (Epub & Mobi) |
Edition | 1st |
Extent | 320 |
ISBN | 9780585118932 |
Imprint | Rowman & Littlefield Publishers |
Publisher | Bloomsbury Publishing |
About the contributors
Reviews
-
Ron Terchek has made a major contribution to the liberal-communitarian debate . . . with his rich, complex reading of classic texts . . . Tercheck's work should move the contemporary debate onto new ground.
Suzanne D. Jacobitti, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville
-
Liberals and communitarians have long criticized each other, but here is a book that invites them to listen to one another . . . This is a doubly admirable book. The scholarship is first rate, and the presentation is remarkably even handed and open minded.
Alfonso J. Damico, University of Iowa
-
By inviting us to return to the past, Terchek has done us a service.
American Political Science Review
-
Terchek is to be commended for "welcoming politics back to theory". . .
The Review of Politics
-
Ronald J Terchek gazes upon the liberal/communitarian debate from an entirely new direction, essentially from the past. In arguing that both contemporary liberals and communitarians have neglected important parts of their own traditions. Tercheck journeys back to what he calls strong republicans (Aristotle, Machiavelli, and Rousseau) and anxious liberals (Locke, Smith, and J.S. Mill) to show that the earlier republicans/communiatrian and liberal philosophies were more complex and more subtle than often supposed. In doing this, Terchek has written an insightful book that is a good warning to all of us not to simplify classical and early modern thinkers in the European tradition.
Roger Boesche, Political Theory
-
Ronald Tercheck is a thoughtful and knowledgeable interpreter of the liberal and Republican traditions in political theory . . . he summons his insight . . . to deepen and refine our understanding of the purposes and problems of contemporary liberal democracy.
Thomas Spragens, Duke University