Caivano’s study of Thomas Jefferson reveals how Jefferson's ideas were shaped by the time he lived, yet he contends that exploring the contours of Jefferson’s thought offers important lessons to the present era of political unrest and discontent. Jefferson articulated that all men are created equal, but his concept had severe limitations, such as the exclusion of women and Black and Indigenous peoples. Ultimately, Jefferson wanted to engage people on the local level, which would permit the continuation of a society that resisted absolute degrees of obedience and conformity. [Caivano] insists that Jeffersonian thought continues to influence the social fabric of the United States, because Jefferson stressed the sanctity of natural rights, the ability of a people to self-govern, a holistic ecological perspective, and a sociological examination of the sources and origin of power and morality. Even so, Jefferson's vision of true democracy remains incomplete. Recommended. Advanced undergraduates through faculty.

Choice Reviews

At this critical moment when the West is suffering its gravest legitimation crisis since World War II, Caivano brilliantly discovers a Jefferson whose underappreciated revolutionary ideals place him beyond the stifling constraints of American political thought into the vastness of the cosmos of radical democratic theorists. Caivano shows how Jefferson’s ideas hold the potential of a powerful weapon against the present authoritarian zeitgeist by its open, promising, “politics of all” for this, and future, generations to come.

Richard Matthews, Lehigh University

Deeply researched and beautifully written, Dean Caivano’s work articulates a novel interpretation of a towering figure of early American thought. A Politics for All makes a significant contribution to the history of political thought and to radical democratic theory.

Martin Breaugh, York University

Caivano’s unique approach to articulating a critical and alternative theory of democracy based on Thomas Jefferson’s historical works is thought-provoking and timely in this era of democratic upheaval and uncertainty, especially in the U.S.. His treatment of important strands of political thought, and the way he re-imagines the idea of politics for all, invites readers to re-think their notions of democracy in a historical, yet readable fashion.

Julian Campisi, University of Toronto-Scarborough