Free US delivery on orders $35 or over
This product is usually dispatched within 1 week
Free US delivery on orders $35 or over
You must sign in to add this item to your wishlist. Please sign in or create an account
Rhetoric and Technical Communication in HOPE VI presents a rhetorical analysis of key documents and technical writing associated with HOPE VI, a federal mixed-income, public housing program. Despite mandating resident participation, HOPE VI increased homelessness, reinforced racial segregation, and facilitated gentrification projects that priced out low-income residents. Christopher J. Morris considers this phenomenon of participatory capture, in which participation works against the most vulnerable participants. By articulating participatory capture in contemporary American housing, Morris articulates the dominant narratives, discourses, and methods the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development used to leverage participatory methods and discourses to maintain social inequity. In exploring participation’s pitfalls, the author also offers scholars and practitioners alike an alternative to participation: sovereign design rhetoric.
Published | Nov 07 2024 |
---|---|
Format | Hardback |
Edition | 1st |
Extent | 158 |
ISBN | 9781666946857 |
Imprint | Lexington Books |
Illustrations | 3 Tables |
Dimensions | 9 x 6 inches |
Publisher | Bloomsbury Publishing |
This book is brilliant—and important both for public policy studies and rhetoric and technical communication. Rhetoric and Technical Communication in HOPE VI uses analytical tools from the field of rhetoric and technical communication to interrogate the ‘participatory ethos’ of government programs in which the involvement of residents in the policies that affect them turns out only to legitimize their further marginalization. The book then turns that critique on rhetoric and technical communication itself, interrogating the field’s own ‘ethical’ turn towards participatory methods. In both cases, the concept of ‘sovereignty’ for marginalized groups is proposed instead of ‘participation.’
David Fleming, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Your School account is not valid for the United States site. You have been logged out of your account.
You are on the United States site. Would you like to go to the United States site?
Error message.