- Home
- ACADEMIC
- Philosophy
- Chinese Philosophy
- Standards and Reference in Early Chinese Philosophy of Language
Standards and Reference in Early Chinese Philosophy of Language
Mohist Concepts, Practices, and Texts
Standards and Reference in Early Chinese Philosophy of Language
Mohist Concepts, Practices, and Texts
You must sign in to add this item to your wishlist. Please sign in or create an account
Description
Philosophy of Language in Early China characterizes early Chinese philosophy of language through a focus on standards ('fa'). It argues that standards are understood by early Chinese philosophies to provide the groundwork for language, not only in the Mohist and so-called “Legalist” schools of Zhuangzi and Xunzi, but more widely in syncretic, Confucian, and Daoist texts from the Warring States and early Han. This book demonstrates that standards act as the Chinese counterpart of reference, classifying judgments, linguistic competence, class membership, and concepts found in contemporary analytic texts. In particular, Philosophy of Language in Early China provides a way to account for the reference of our words, and can account for error in a way that characterizes it in a very different way to the analytic tradition.
Providing new insights into ancient Chinese thought, this book will be of interest to those working in comparative philosophy, Chinese philosophy and East Asian studies.
Table of Contents
A Note on Citations of Chinese texts
1. Introduction to Chinese Philosophy of Language
2. Standards and Classification in Early China
3. Select Linguistic Activities
4. Standards-based Critiques of Language
5. Reference in the Mohist Texts
6. The Mohist Theory of Communication
Bibliography
Index
Product details
| Published | 11 Dec 2025 |
|---|---|
| Format | Ebook (Epub & Mobi) |
| Edition | 1st |
| Extent | 184 |
| ISBN | 9781350085138 |
| Imprint | Bloomsbury Academic |
| Publisher | Bloomsbury Publishing |
About the contributors
Reviews
-
"Was there philosophy in classical China? 50 years ago analysis of the recently rediscovered Mohist theory of language tipped the balance in favor of a positive answer. Now an ambitious philosopher of language and historian of philosophy is taking up the interpretations of Mohist theory of language to bring them into contact with modern Western theories and to argue for including Chinese thought in philosophical curricula. This fresh discussion of the relation between pragmatic standards and semantic reference is a must read for anyone interested in cross-cultural philosophy."
Chad Hansen, Professor of Philosophy, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

























